It's hard to follow this because I am not familiar with the terminology of horoscopes, but as I was reading I could not help thinking of Yeats' poem "The Second Coming." The Irish poet made a big deal out of destiny that he depicted as an alternation of 2,000-year pagan-and-Christian cycles. I think Yeats would understand the logic of this article and he might agree or disagree with various points. But what startled me was the last couple pages on Russia and Ukraine, whose history, especially now, can not be explained scientifically (at least not totally) but seems to make sense when you ascribe it to the influence of outside forces, which might as well be the planets and the stars. (We are talking about Russians here, after all.) Let's see where Gargatholil goes with this. I still confess my understanding is spasmodic and tentative, though there are moments when the text is enjoyable and appears to make as a sense that I cannot always put my fingers on. Good luck.
Great one. Apart from the analysis, I really liked this: "astrology is a nonlinear science/art and its symbols are highly fungeable, meaning that the same symbols (such as Saturn and Neptune) can be employed to convey different meanings in different contexts of the same situation – they easily shift between representing one object or phenomenon and representing another." To me this is why one could keep looking at a chart and keep seeing more...astrologers have to reign themselves in when doing readings and for me, that's where intuition comes in...what does the client need to hear and which combination is interpreting this. And the chart...Venus Saturn conjunction in water resonates to DT's natal chart. Looking at it as an election chart with Horary eyes, the Libra (law and agreements and contractual relationships) Moon is inconjunct Venus and Saturn (he is losing popularity as his secret motives are playing out) applying square Mercury and POF and will oppose Chiron in Aries. Then inconjunct Uranus, then square Mars, and another inconjunct to Neptune. The course is not clear and surprises may come...about the compter votes and musk , and of course the Epstein circus that wants us to look away from gerrymandering attempts for the middterms. He was Neptune in Pisces to Hillary's Pluto in Cap and Sanders Jupiter in Virgo in the 2016 primaries...it was stronger in it's own sign and Bernie dropped out...and so did Jupiter in Virgo. Will that final inconjunct from the LIbra Moon be strong enough to mster Neptune in Pisces in court?
It's hard to follow this because I am not familiar with the terminology of horoscopes, but as I was reading I could not help thinking of Yeats' poem "The Second Coming." The Irish poet made a big deal out of destiny that he depicted as an alternation of 2,000-year pagan-and-Christian cycles. I think Yeats would understand the logic of this article and he might agree or disagree with various points. But what startled me was the last couple pages on Russia and Ukraine, whose history, especially now, can not be explained scientifically (at least not totally) but seems to make sense when you ascribe it to the influence of outside forces, which might as well be the planets and the stars. (We are talking about Russians here, after all.) Let's see where Gargatholil goes with this. I still confess my understanding is spasmodic and tentative, though there are moments when the text is enjoyable and appears to make as a sense that I cannot always put my fingers on. Good luck.
Great one. Apart from the analysis, I really liked this: "astrology is a nonlinear science/art and its symbols are highly fungeable, meaning that the same symbols (such as Saturn and Neptune) can be employed to convey different meanings in different contexts of the same situation – they easily shift between representing one object or phenomenon and representing another." To me this is why one could keep looking at a chart and keep seeing more...astrologers have to reign themselves in when doing readings and for me, that's where intuition comes in...what does the client need to hear and which combination is interpreting this. And the chart...Venus Saturn conjunction in water resonates to DT's natal chart. Looking at it as an election chart with Horary eyes, the Libra (law and agreements and contractual relationships) Moon is inconjunct Venus and Saturn (he is losing popularity as his secret motives are playing out) applying square Mercury and POF and will oppose Chiron in Aries. Then inconjunct Uranus, then square Mars, and another inconjunct to Neptune. The course is not clear and surprises may come...about the compter votes and musk , and of course the Epstein circus that wants us to look away from gerrymandering attempts for the middterms. He was Neptune in Pisces to Hillary's Pluto in Cap and Sanders Jupiter in Virgo in the 2016 primaries...it was stronger in it's own sign and Bernie dropped out...and so did Jupiter in Virgo. Will that final inconjunct from the LIbra Moon be strong enough to mster Neptune in Pisces in court?